Legal Opinion
Chet Adams Co. v. James F. Pederson Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 13, 1992No. 23558PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
The sole issue on appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred in remanding this case to me circuit court for a determination of issues arising out of petitioner Chet Adams’ failure to comply with S.C. Code Ann. § 33-15-102(a) (1990). We reverse and remand the case to the Court of Appeals for a decision on the merits.
I. FACTS
Petitioner Chet Adams Company, a foreign corporation, brought this action against respondent James F. Pederson Company to recover monies allegedly owed on an account as the result of the sale of air conditioning equipment. After a non-jury trial, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Video Engineering Co. v. Foto-Video Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1967
- Hoover v. HooverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Cost of Wisconsin, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- H & H Glass Co., Inc. v. WynneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Farmer v. Monsanto Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Capco Acquisub, Inc. v. Greka Energy Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- McClurg v. DeatonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- McCullar v. Estate of CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Fast Photo Express, Inc. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.