Legal Opinion

In re Byard

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1996No. 1994-1693PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 294.] IN RE BYARD, APPELLANT, v. BYLER, APPELLEE. [Cite as In re Byard,

1996-Ohio-163.] Domestic relations—Reciprocal enforcement of child support—R.C. Chapter 3115 does not confer subject matter jurisdiction over issues concerning child custody and visitation in an action for child support enforcement. __________________ Ohio’s Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (“URESA”), R.C. Chapter 3115, does not confer subject matter jurisdiction over issues concerning child custody and visitation in an action for child…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moffat v. MoffatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Byard v. BylerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Probate Div.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In re PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Hubbard v. HubbardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Athens Cty. Dept. of Job v. Martin, 07 Ca 11 (4-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Cleveland v. LucasOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Lagrange Development Corp. v. City of Toledo, L-08-1226 (5-15-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API