Byard v. Byler
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
The issue presented by this case is whether Ohio’s Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (“URESA”), R.C. Chapter 3115, grants a court subject matter jurisdiction to determine child custody and visitation rights. The purpose of URESA is to “improve and extend by reciprocal legislation the enforcement of duties of support ” across state lines. (Emphasis added.) R.C. 3115.01(A); Levi v. Levi (1960), 170 Ohio St. 533, 11 O.O.2d 364, 166 N.E.2d 744, syllabus. More specifically, R.C. 3115.29 strictly limits to matters of support the court’s subject matter jurisdiction in a URESA action:
“Part…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moffat v. MoffatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- In re PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Hubbard v. HubbardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- County of San Diego v. ElavskyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Wilson-Simmons v. Lake County Sheriff's DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Young v. International Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.