Legal Opinion
Fleschler v. Strauss
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 4, 1936No. Civ. 9838PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
The trial court found from the evidence in this case that the defendant Joseph B. Strauss was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $5,000 on an assigned account stated. Judgment was entered accordingly, and defendant appeals. In our opinion the appeal is utterly without merit.
Plaintiff’s case was established at the trial by the uncontradicted testimony of two witnesses. One was plaintiff’s assignor, attorney Charles H. Brennan, and the other, attorney Joseph Mclnerney, who acted in behalf of defendant in carrying on the negotiations with Brennan which resulted in the agreement constituting the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Koeber v. SomersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Kast v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Crane v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Converse v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Carlson, Collins, Gordon & Bold v. BanducciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- KROLL & TRACK v. Paris & ParisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Kroll & Tract v. Paris & ParisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.