Legal Opinion
KROLL & TRACK v. Paris & Paris
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1999No. G019790PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
86 Cal.Rptr.2d 78 (1999)
72 Cal.App.4th 1537
KROLL & TRACT et al., Cross-complainants and Appellants,
v.
PARIS & PARIS et al., Cross-defendants and Respondents.
No. G019790.
Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three.
June 24, 1999.
Barton, Klugman & Oetting and Charles J. Schufreider, Los Angeles, for Cross-complainants and Appellants.
Wilner, Klein & Siegel, Edward E. Wallace and Patrick M. Malone, Beverly Hills, for Cross-defendants and Respondents.
OPINION
SILLS, P.J.
Sound policy reasons prohibit an attorney sued for malpractice by a former client from cross-complaining for indemnity against…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- American Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Ben Arnold-Sunbelt Beverage Company Of South Carolina, LpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Sheetz, Inc. v. Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love, PLLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Leko v. Cornerstone Bldg. Inspection Serv.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Griffin Dewatering Corp. v. Northern Ins. Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.