Crane v. Stansbury
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Thomas O. Toland, Lewis W. Andrews, and Andrews, Toland & Andrews, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was brought to recover attorney’s fees for services rendered to defendants by Oscar A. Trippet, plaintiff's assignor. The complaint charged in several counts and sought a recovery for $2,160.40, with interest from the eleventh day of July, 1911. One count charged upon an account stated, another upon an express contract, a third in quantum meruit. Trial was had before a jury which rendered its verdict in a sum totaling the amount sued for with interest. From the judgment and order refusing them a new trial defendants appeal.
It is made to appear that in 1904 the city of Los Angeles…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wiggins v. BurkhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Oil Co. v. Van EttenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hendy v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Jasper Trust Co. v. LamkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Fleischner, Mayer & Co. v. KubliOregon Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- California Bean Growers' Ass'n v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Guardianship of JacobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- California Bean Growers Ass'n v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.