Legal Opinion

United States v. Gossler

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 2, 1945No. Civ. 1729PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.

This action for condemnation of lands came on for trial of value of the interests of defendants Gallagher and intervenors McNutt, in the Gossler tract of land, before the court with a jury. A verdict was returned establishing the market value of these interests and judgment entered. A motion for a new trial has been filed by the defendants. In order that the points raised thereby may be considered in relation to the setting, a review of the course of the proceedings is necessary.

The action was initiated in the usual manner. The complaint alleged that the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. United States v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. A. W. Duckett & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Emery v. Boston Terminal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hi Holdridge, A/K/A Hiram Holdridge, Larry Shumm and Neil Delmar Haworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Union Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. City of Missoula v. MixMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Steiner v. Shawmut National Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
  5. State v. HunterMontana Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API