Legal Opinion

Hi Holdridge, A/K/A Hiram Holdridge, Larry Shumm and Neil Delmar Haworth v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1960No. 16380_1PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge.

Two Informations charged these three appellants with violating Title 18 U.S.C. § 1382 1 in that they re-entered and were found within Mead Ordnance Depot, Mead, Nebraska, a military reservation, after having been removed from it and ordered not to re-enter. 2 The cases were consolidated for trial. The jury found the defendants guilty and each received a fine and sentence.

It appears without controversy that the property in question was a military reservation enclosed, partially at least, by a fence, and with an East Gate and a North Gate; that Holdridge and Shumm on…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. AlbertiniSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. SpockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  4. Ollie Melvin Hodges v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. HilandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API