Legal Opinion

A. W. Duckett & Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 17, 1924No. 108PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a claim against the United States for the value of the claimant’s interest in Pier No. 8 of the Bush Terminal Company under a lease that ran through Sep- tembér 30, 1919. The claim is based upon an implied contract alleged to have arisen from a taking for war purposes, for such time as might be necessary, of described portions of the Bush Terminal docks and warehouses, including the claimant’s pier. The Court of Claims dismissed the petition for want of jurisdiction upon the ground that the facts found excluded as matter of law the possibility that a contract should be implied and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. United States v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Emery v. Boston Terminal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Phelps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Hi Holdridge, A/K/A Hiram Holdridge, Larry Shumm and Neil Delmar Haworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Alamo Land & Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API