McMahan v. Hickey's Supermarket
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
We hold that the evidence and reasonable inferences arising from that evidence support the crucial findings of the Commission. “Under the Workmen’s Compensation Act the Industrial Commission is made the fact-finding body, and the rule is, as fixed' by statute and the uniform decisions of this Court, that the findings of fact made by the Commission are conclusive on appeal. ...” Rice v. Chair Co., 238 N.C. 121, 124, 76 S.E. 2d 311, 313.
“ ‘This and other courts of the United States have held that the various compensation acts should be liberally construed so that the benefits…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keller v. ELECTRIC WIRING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Edwards v. . Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Moore v. Engineering & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Searcy v. BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Bigelow v. Tire Sales CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Porterfield v. RPC CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Key v. Wagner Woodcraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Stewart v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Long v. Morganton Dyeing & Finishing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987