Legal Opinion

Long v. Morganton Dyeing & Finishing Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1987No. 8610IC555PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

In reviewing decisions of the Industrial Commission, we are limited to determining whether the findings of the Commission are supported by competent evidence and whether those findings justify its legal conclusions. Roper v. J.P. Stevens & Co., 65 N.C. App. 69, 308 S.E. 2d 485 (1983), disc. review denied, 310 N.C. 309, 312 S.E. 2d 652 (1984). Plaintiff argues that the Commission’s finding that he failed to prove that his hernia was accompanied by pain is unsupported by the evidence and that the finding does not justify the Commission’s conclusion that there was no causal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roper v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. News & Observer Publishing Co. v. State Ex Rel. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. McMahan v. Hickey's SupermarketCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Lutes v. Export Leaf Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Long v. Morganton Dyeing & Finishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Long v. Morganton Dyeing & Finishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Strain v. Curtis Wright Flight SystemsNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API