Searcy v. Branson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.
The appellants insist that the evidence of the plaintiff is insufficient to support the finding that his injury arose out of and in the course of his employment.
Under our practice, if there is any competent evidence to support a finding of fact of the Industrial Commission, such finding is conclusive on appeal, even though there is evidence that would have supported a finding to the contrary. Creighton v. Snipes, 227 N.C. 90, 40 S.E. 2d 612; Rewis v. Ins. Co., 226 N.C. 325, 38 S.E. 2d 97; Kearns v. Furniture Co., 222 N.C. 438, 23 S.E. 2d 310.
In our opinion, there is competent evidence to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Smith v. Cabarrus Creamery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Edwards v. . Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Adams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Davis v. Raleigh Rental CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Ashley v. Rent-A-Car CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Keller v. ELECTRIC WIRING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.