Harris v. Smith
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Hughes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
—The plaintiff had judgment in the court below for the recovery of the possession of the personal property described in the complaint, or for the sum of $350, the value thereof, and $100 as damages and costs. The defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The grounds urged for reversal are, insufficiency of the complaint; misjoinder of causes of action; insufficiency of evidence -to justify the findings; and the allowance of attorney’s fees as damages.
1. The complaint, it is contended, fails to allege ownership or right of possession at the time of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Kelly v. McKibbenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Affierbach v. McGovernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Holly v. HeiskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Arzaga v. VillalbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- LeFave v. DimondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Tucker v. HagertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Sidney v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.