Legal Opinion

Cox Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 16, 1989No. Nos. 658-85-C, 322-86-CPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TURNER, Judge.

The plaintiff joint venture (Cox), having prevailed on the merits, has applied under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (1986), for the attorneys’ fees and expert witness expenses incurred in litigating this contract action. Plaintiff obtained judgments totalling $1,783,525 on April 27, 1988. Cox seeks an award of $251,681.35 ($155,612.44 for attorneys’ fees and $96,068.91 for expert witness expenses). Plaintiff’s application is granted in part and denied in part. The amount of plaintiff’s award shall be determined according to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  4. Gavette v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  5. Leroy H. Ellis v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Levernier Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. California Marine Cleaning, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  4. Griffin & Dickson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  5. Prowest Diversified, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API