Legal Opinion

Prowest Diversified, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 13, 1998No. 94-516CPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge.

Following this court’s resolution of liability and damages in favor of plaintiff, defendant filed a motion for costs pursuant to Rule 68 of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Plaintiff opposed the motion and, on February 18, 1997, filed an application for attorney fees and other expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1994). For the reasons discussed herein, the court denies defendant’s motion for costs and partially grants plaintiffs EAJA application for fees in the amount of $50,205.16.1

FACTS

The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. California Marine Cleaning, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  2. Hopi Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Filtration Development Co., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Infinite Information Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API