Legal Opinion
California Marine Cleaning, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 14, 1999No. 98-636CPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON EAJA FEES
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending before the court is the application (as amended) of plaintiff California Marine Cleaning, Inc. (“California Marine”) for attorney and paralegal fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (1994 & Supp. II 1996). California Marine was clearly the prevailing party in that it obtained injunctive relief in this bid protest proceeding. Defendant opposes the application on various grounds, including that the government’s po*726sition was substantially justified. For reasons set out below, the court grants the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Charles W. Bazalo, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Hyatt v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- CEMS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Geo-Seis Helicopters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.