Lindquist v. Weber
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Thomas and Kathryn Lindquist appeal from an amended judgment granting respondents Donald and Sharon Weber a prescriptive easement over their land. At issue is an access route used by respondents and their predecessors as a means of ingress to and egress from their cabin. Appellants claim that the trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding that usage of the access road was hostile for the required statutory period when portions of the access road crossed over a roadway dedicated to the public. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants are legal owners of property in Stearns County…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dozier v. KrmpotichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- McCuen v. McCarvelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Bohm v. Independent School Dist. No. 283Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heuer v. County of AitkinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Gabler v. FedorukCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Gabler v. FedorukCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008