Legal Opinion

Lindquist v. Weber

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1987No. C3-86-1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Thomas and Kathryn Lindquist appeal from an amended judgment granting respondents Donald and Sharon Weber a prescriptive easement over their land. At issue is an access route used by respondents and their predecessors as a means of ingress to and egress from their cabin. Appellants claim that the trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding that usage of the access road was hostile for the required statutory period when portions of the access road crossed over a roadway dedicated to the public. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellants are legal owners of property in Stearns County…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dozier v. KrmpotichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. McCuen v. McCarvelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Bohm v. Independent School Dist. No. 283Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heuer v. County of AitkinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Gabler v. FedorukCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Gabler v. FedorukCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API