Gabler v. Fedoruk
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1DissentJohnson, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the court. A district court sitting in equity has broad discretion to fashion an equitable remedy based on the particular facts of a given case. In this case, the district court granted the Gablers a prescriptive easement that would allow them to continue using the driveway that connects their home to the nearest public road. I would conclude that the district court did not abuse its broad discretion when it granted the Gablers that equitable remedy and declined to grant the broader equitable remedy of a boundary by practical location.
In describing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Nadeau v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.