Legal Opinion

Bohm v. Independent School Dist. No. 283

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 1984No. C9-84-426PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Seven retired school teachers brought an action to recover statutory early retirement incentives allegedly owed them by the school district pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 125.611 (1980). The school district denied any obligation to pay incentives because it had already paid the teachers severance pay. It claims that severance pay qualified as early retirement incentive pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 125.611 (1980) and the teachers are not entitled to an additional incentive grant.

The trial court entered judgment in favor of the teachers. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondents are former St.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. FitzimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Leininger v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Goodman v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Hardwick v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Lindquist v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. STATE BY SPANNAUS v. Belmont, HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. Independent School District No. 624Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API