Heuer v. County of Aitkin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge. *
On appeal from summary judgment involving an attempt to establish a prescriptive easement over what are now public lands, appellants allege that (a) the district court erred in applying the statute of limitations in Minn.Stat. § 541.01 (2000) because the statute does not apply to prescriptive easements; (b) even if the statute does apply to such easements, the county did not become the owner of the land in question until after the prescriptive easement had already been established; and (c) equity precludes application of the statute in this case. During the pendency of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Claussen v. City of LauderdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Carlone v. City of St. PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, 2000, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024