Legal Opinion

Heuer v. County of Aitkin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 2002No. C0-01-2121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge. *

On appeal from summary judgment involving an attempt to establish a prescriptive easement over what are now public lands, appellants allege that (a) the district court erred in applying the statute of limitations in Minn.Stat. § 541.01 (2000) because the statute does not apply to prescriptive easements; (b) even if the statute does apply to such easements, the county did not become the owner of the land in question until after the prescriptive easement had already been established; and (c) equity precludes application of the statute in this case. During the pendency of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Claussen v. City of LauderdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Carlone v. City of St. PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  4. Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, 2000, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API