Legal Opinion

Pue v. Bushnell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1925No. 5,592PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

On January 3, 1922, respondent commenced an action against appellant on an open account, and prayed for judgment for the amount stated and interest at eight per cent from December 20, 1921. On February 17, 1922, appellant joined issue by general denial. Nothing further was done until some time in December, 1923, when, it appears, the cause was set for trial. On December 28, 1923, appellant filed and served notice of motion and motion for leave to file a supplemental answer, tendering therewith his proposed a!nswer, alleging that on April 7, 1922, he was duly adjudged a bankrupt, and on the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cullen v. Western Mortgage & Warranty Title Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Marcellus v. WrightMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Henderson v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Jensen v. DorrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Mayger v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ramsbacher v. HohmanMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In Re Fort Shaw Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Story Gold Dredging Co. v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Western Montana National Bank v. Home InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API