Legal Opinion
Mayger v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1923No. 5,192PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway
Plaintiff, as administratrix of the estate of William Mayger, deceased, brought this action to recover from the defendant the sum of $19,639.50, balance alleged to be due upon an account stated, with interest. Judgment in her favor resulted, from which defendant appeals.
The action is upon an account stated. Defendant alleges that the complaint does not state a cause of action. In this it is wrong. (See McFarland v. Cutter, 1 Mont. 383; Voight v. Brooks, 19 Mont. 374, 48 Pac. 549; Martin v. Heinze, 31 Mont. 68, 77 Pac. 427; and Noyes, Admx., v. Young, 32 Mont. 226, 79 Pac. 1063.) The answer is…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Martin v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sparks v. Dispatch Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Adams Mining Co. v. SenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Cullen v. Western Mortgage & Warranty Title Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
- Mining Co. v. Anglo-Californian BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wells-Dickey Co. v. EmbodyMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Alley v. Butte & Western Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
- Bingham v. National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Ainsworth v. KrugerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Golden Rod Mining Co. v. BukvichMontana Supreme Court · 1939
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.