Legal Opinion

Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & Hadden

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1999No. 1997-1998PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 171.] FRED SIEGEL CO., L.P.A. ET AL., APPELLEES, v. ARTER & HADDEN ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & Hadden,

1999-Ohio-260.] Torts—Elements of tortious interference with contract—Establishing lack of justification element in tort of tortious interference with contract—Factors in determining whether an actor has acted improperly in intentionally interfering with a contract or prospective contract of another— Establishment of privilege of fair competition will defeat claim of tortious…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kenty v. Transamerica Premium InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & HaddenOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Plain Dealer v. Ohio Dept. of InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Corti v. FleisherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. DeepRock Disposal Solutions, L.L.C. v. Forté Prods., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Horter Investment Management, LLC v. CutterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
  3. Gracetech Inc. v. PerezOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Laurel Valley Oil v. 76 Lubricants Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Kademian v. MargerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API