Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Droe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1996No. 1996-1466PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 89.] CLEVELAND BAR ASSOCIATION v. DROE. [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Droe,

1996-Ohio-339.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—One-year suspension with sanction stayed for the second six months—Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation—Neglecting an entrusted legal matter. (No. 96-1466—Submitted September 10, 1996—Decided November 13, 1996.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 95-73. __________________ {¶ 1} On July 28,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. TrumboOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lake County Bar Ass'n v. SperosOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. TrumboOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. DroeOhio Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. BaasOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DroeOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. DroeOhio Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API