Merrill v. Eastland Woolen Mills, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
GODFREY, Justice.
Employee Merrill appeals from a pro for-ma decree of the Superior Court affirming the denial by the Workers’ Compensation Commission of his petition to annul a lump-sum agreement. The principal issue raised by the appellant is whether, under 39 M.R.S.A. § 102 (1978), as amended by P.L. 1977, ch. 709, § 5, the Commission has authority to annul for mistake of fact a lump-sum settlement agreement executed by the parties and approved by the Commission in 1971. Because we hold that the Commission has such authority by virtue of the 1978 amendment of section 102, we sustain the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miller v. FallonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
- Coffin v. RichSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
- Dobson v. Quinn Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Coates v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Reggep v. Lunder Shoe Products CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Michaud v. Northern Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Norton v. C.P. Blouin, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Commissioner of the Department of Human Services v. MasseySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.