Legal Opinion

Reggep v. Lunder Shoe Products Company

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 14, 1968PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEATHERBEE, Justice.

On appeal from a Pro Forma Decree of the Superior Court.

For several years prior to 1965 our statutes providing Workmen’s Compensation for personal injuries computed compensation for all total incapacities on the basis of Ys of the employee’s average weekly wages! 39 M.R.S.A. § 54. This included the so-called permanent total incapacities resulting from the most devastating injuries for which weekly compensation could be paid for as long as 500 weeks and the so-called presumed total incapacities resulting from less serious injuries where the law arbitrarily limited…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gauthier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  2. Coffin v. RichSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
  3. Farris ex rel. Dorsky v. GossSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  4. Sweeney v. DahlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  5. Inhabitants of Ashland v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Price v. All American Engineering CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  3. Dobson v. Quinn Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. Barrett v. Herbert Engineering, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  5. Terry v. St. Regis Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API