Legal Opinion

Norton v. C.P. Blouin, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 25, 1986PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

The employee, William H. Norton, appeals from a decision of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Commission, reversing an award granted against the employer, C.P. Blouin, Inc. In awarding compensation, the single commissioner applied 39 M.R.S.A. § 194-B (Supp. 1985-1986) to Norton’s claim for an asbestos-related disease. The Appellate Division found his claim to be controlled and barred by the provisions of 39 M.R.S.A. § 194-A (1978), a predecessor statute in effect at the time Norton became incapacitated. We conclude that section 194-B controls the claim and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Adams v. Buffalo Forge Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Mailman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  5. Miller v. FallonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Morgan-Leland v. University of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  5. Demello v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API