Legal Opinion

Miller v. Fallon

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 3, 1936PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

This is an action on the case to recover compensation for losses suffered by the plaintiff as a result of alleged malpractice by the defendant, a practicing physician and surgeon. The defendant having seasonably pleaded the statute of limitations, by consent of the parties the case is reported on an agreed statement of facts.

The report shows that on November 18, 1929, the defendant operated on the plaintiff for hemorrhoids and, until January 9, 1930, following, continued with post-operative treatment. It is agreed that the acts and omissions of alleged malpractice charged in the writ occurred…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mulvey v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. E. S. Parks Shellac Co. v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Hathaway v. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. McKisson v. DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Adams & Freese Co. v. KenoyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Hossler Ex Rel. Dows v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Tantish v. SzendeySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API