Legal Opinion

United States v. Fliegler

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 29, 1990No. CV 88-0752 (ADS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

The issue in this action is whether the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution (see U.S. Const., Arndt. V [“nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb”]) precludes the Court from entering partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”). Since the Court finds that the granting of partial summary judgment would not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause, the Government’s motion is granted.

I. THE CIVIL ACTION

From September…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ianniello v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  2. Lyndonville Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. LussierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Morse Diesel International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. United States v. BoutteDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1995
  5. United States v. PetersDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API