Legal Opinion
United States v. Boutte
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided October 25, 1995No. 1:94-cr-00102PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COBB, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment against Gregory Boutte, filed by the United States. The United States claims that the defendants, Gregory Boutte and Boutte, Elmore & Company, committed twenty-three acts in violation of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq. For the reasons stated below, this Court finds that the United States of America should prevail against Mr. Boutte as a matter of law on all its claims. Finding there to be no issues of material fact in dispute, this Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion.
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- G.D. Searle & Co. v. Medicore Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Morse Diesel International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Jennings v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. PetersDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1996
- Duncan v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.