Legal Opinion

United States v. Peters

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided June 3, 1996No. 4:CV 95-3347PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, District Judge.

Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (filing 11, Defendant’s motion; filing 15, Plaintiffs motion) and the evidence submitted in support of these motions. 1 For the reasons discussed below I will grant the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and deny defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

In December 1993, Stanley L. Peters (Peters) was convicted on three counts of submitting false claims to the Environmental Protection Agency, one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, and one count…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morse Diesel International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. United States Ex Rel. Augustine v. Century Health Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2000
  3. United States Ex Rel. Lamberts v. StokesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. United States v. MWI Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Duncan v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API