Legal Opinion

Lyndonville Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Lussier

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 3, 2000No. Docket No. 98-7079PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:

We construe on this appeal a federal statute that permits a restitution order entered in a criminal sentencing proceeding to be enforced like a judgment in a civil suit. The restitution order in this case directed defendants to repay their victim a large sum of money. The victim brought a federal civil suit to have the criminal order amended to direct payment in full “forthwith,” rather than in installments as provided in the restitution order. The statute in question grants a victim the right to enforce a restitution order “in the same manner as a judgment in a civil…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Darden v. Daimlerchrysler North America Holding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. United States v. Walter Kevin ScottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Harris v. New York State Department of HealthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. Preston v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API