Legal Opinion

Nettles v. Carson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 17, 1920No. 9500PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, Coal County; J.H. Linebaugh, Judge. Action for possession of automobile under chattel mortgage by W. L. Nettles against H. J. Porter and another, mortgagors, and against Charles W. Carson and another who claimed a lien on the property for material and repairs. Judgment for Carson and another, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This was an action in reple-vin to recover possession of one Maxwell automobile; suit being instituted in the district court of Coal county on the 7th day of December, 1916. The admitted facts are that on August 1, 1916, H. J. Porter and Susan Porter executed and delivered to plaintiff in error, W. L. Nettles, a certain promissory note as a part of the purchase price of said automobile; that said note was secured by a chattel mortgage on said automobile, which said mortgage was duly filed in the office of the county clerk of Pontotoc county on the 9th day of August, 1916, where the Porters…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Huston v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Sampson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  3. Gardner v. School Dist. No. 87, Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Muskogee Times-Democrat v. Com'rs of Muskogee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cochran v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Greer v. BirdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Standard Co. Dairy v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Norton-Johnson Buick Co. v. LindleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. United Tire & Investment Co. v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API