Legal Opinion
United Tire & Investment Co. v. Maxwell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 28, 1950No. 33608PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The parties in this action occupied the same relative positions in the trial court, and hereafter they will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.
John W. Egan gave a chattel mortgage on an automobile to Risner’s Used Cars, which was duly assigned to United Tire & Investment Company, a trust. The mortgage and assignment were duly recorded in Tulsa county, Okla., as required by law. Thereafter, said automobile was damaged in a wreck. At the request of the owner, John W. Egan, defendant H. L. Maxwell towed the wrecked automobile to his garage and stored it for some time. He retained…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norman v. Scrivner-Stevens Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Nettles v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Greer v. BirdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Norton-Johnson Buick Co. v. LindleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- De Groff v. CarhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Jardine Insurance Services Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- MacK Motor Truck Corporation v. WolfeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Commerce Acceptance of Oklahoma City, Inc. v. PressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Capson v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF ARIZ., ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Bank America Commercial v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.