Byrd v. Mortenson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendants’ primary attack on appeal is on the trial judge’s refusal to set aside the defaults against them.
For the entry of a default to be disturbed, as those entered by the Clerk of Superior Court on 3 and 6 April in this case, G.S. 1A-1, Rule 55(d) requires that “good cause” be shown. That determination is in the trial judge’s discretion and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion. Frye v. Wiles, 33 N.C. App. 581, 235 S.E. 2d 889 (1977). Crotts v. Pawn Shop, 16 N.C. App. 392, 192 S.E. 2d 55, cert. denied 282 N.C. 425, 192 S.E. 2d 835 (1972).
This Court follows the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Peebles v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Whaley v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- North American Acceptance Corp. v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Peebles v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- RC ASSOCIATES v. Regency Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Bailey v. GoodingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Beard v. PembaurCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Old Salem Foreign Car Service, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Byrd v. MortensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982