Connery v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, W. R. Cray, J., denying a motion to vacate a writ of attachment. Public, policy exempted the car from the process of attachment. The Minnesota Transfer Railway Company and the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Company had-vested rights in the car founded on a contract arrangement then in force between them and the defendant, of-which rights it was not in the power of the court to deprive them.
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, W. R. Cray, J., denying a motion to vacate a writ of attachment. Public, policy exempted the car from the process of attachment. The Minnesota Transfer Railway Company and the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Company had-vested rights in the car founded on a contract arrangement then in force between them and the defendant, of-which rights it was not in the power of the court to deprive them. Michigan v. Chicago, 1 Bradwell (Ill. App.) 399; Wall v. Norfolk, 52 W. Va. 485; Strom v. Montana Central Ry. Co., 81 Minn. 346.…
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a writ of attachment under which one of defendant’s freight cars was seized in an action for an alleged delay in forwarding a consignment of strawberries shipped from a point on defendant’s road in Missouri to be sent through successive railway carriers to Minneapolis.
The complaint alleges a cause of action which, if established, would entitle plaintiff to recover for an alleged negligent delay in transmitting *22perishable goods to the consignee, but it is claimed by the moving party that the property levied upon, though owned by the defendant and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strom v. Montana Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Wall v. N. & W. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
- Michigan Central Railroad v. Chicago & Michigan Lake Shore RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878
- Stevenot v. Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Baldwin v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rosenbush v. BernheimerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Koontz v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Starkey v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Johnson v. Union Pac. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.