Legal Opinion

Rosenbush v. Bernheimer

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 29, 1912PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Contract, by the members of a partnership doing business in Boston, against the members of a partnership doing business in Baltimore in the State of Maryland, for the price of merchandise alleged to have been sold by the plaintiffs to the defendants.

Read the full summary

Contract, by the members of a partnership doing business in Boston, against the members of a partnership doing business in Baltimore in the State of Maryland, for the price of merchandise alleged to have been sold by the plaintiffs to the defendants. The Merchants and Miners Transportation Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland and having a usual place of business in Boston, was named in the writ as trustee and was served as such trustee on August 4, 1910. No service was made on the defendants. The writ was dated August 3,1910. The answer of the alleged…

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is an action of contract. The defendants are non-residents of this Commonwealth, upon whom no personal service has been made, and who have not appeared. The question is whether the Merchants and Miners Transportation Company shall be charged by reason of an attachment under the trustee process of property in its hands under these circumstances: The Merchants and Miners Transportation Company is a common carrier incorporated under the laws of Maryland, whose steamships ply between Boston and Baltimore. On August 3, 1910, it received from various persons at its Boston terminal for…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. American Railway Express Co. v. Mohawk Dairy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. St. John Brothers Co. v. FalksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Coleman v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API