Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1900No. Nos. 12,268—(125)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover $81.55 damages for detention of a carload of potatoes. The case was tried before Hiñe, J., who found in favor of plaintiffs. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the municipal court of St. Paul in favor of plaintiffs, who complain of the unlawful detention by defendant of a carload of potatoes while being transported over its line from Anoka, in this state, to Chicago, Illinois. This review is limited to the question whether the findings of fact support the conclusions of law upon which the judgment rests.

The facts found by the court are, in brief, as follows: The plaintiffs were partners in the produce business. They delivered to defendant, at its station in Anoka, a quantity of potatoes for transportation to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stevenot v. Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosenbush v. BernheimerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Connery v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. Merz v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API