Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Attachment. Before Judge Reid. City court of Atlanta. November 4, 1905.
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. The only contention made before us by counsel for plaintiff in error is that.a certain railroad car, the property of the Northern Pacific Railway Company, the defendant in attachment, which came into the hands of the garnishee, the Western & Atlantic Railroad Company, within the jurisdiction of the court, after the execution of the attachment by service of the summons of garnishment and before the garnishee filed its answer to the summons of garnishment, is subject to the attachment. The gar*627nishee insisted that the ear was -not subject to attachment, and set forth in its* answer to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Williams v. FearsSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hennington v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. SolanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. MeltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Rosenbush v. BernheimerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Few v. PouCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Summer v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Armour & Co. v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.