Legal Opinion
Etter v. Travelers Insurance Companies
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 1995No. 94-CA-51PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Judge.
Appellant Travelers Insurance Companies (“Travelers”) appeals from the judgment of the Miami County Court of Common Pleas declaring that appellee Nathan W. Etter is entitled to recover under an uninsured motorist policy provided by Travelers because Etter was “occupying” the insured vehicle at the time he was injured.
The facts in this case are not in dispute. On January 10,1993, Laura G. Etter permitted her grandson, Nathan W. Etter, to operate her 1984 Buick Regal automobile. As Nathan was traveling along Interstate 75, which had become slippery due to the cold and drizzly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kish v. Central National Insurance GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Buckeye Union Insurance v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Allstate Insurance v. FlaumenbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Robson v. Lightning Rod Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Joins v. BonnerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Genthner v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- AUTO-OWNERS INS. v. Above All Roofing, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Amberleigh HUDSON v. GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., D/B/A GEICO General Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017
- D'amour v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Burlington Insurance v. Eden Cryogenics LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.