Legal Opinion
Buckeye Union Insurance v. Price
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1974No. 73-974PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, J.
The Buckeye Union policy in effect at the time of the accident provided uninsured motorist protection under its Family Protection Coverage clause. The pertinent language was contained in the following definition :
“ ‘uninsured automobile’ includes * * *:
“(a) an automobile with respect to the ownership, maintenance or use of which there is no bodily injury liability bond or insurance policy applicable at the time of the accident with respect to any person or organization legally responsible for the use of such automobile * * (Emphasis added.)
*97. The issue before this court is whether that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
- In re the Arbitration between Vanguard Insurance & PolchlopekNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Ohio Farmers Ins. v. WrightOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Hardin v. American Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Faruque v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Lane v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Hacker v. DickmanOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Dairyland Insurance v. FinchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.