Legal Opinion

Genthner v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 22, 1996PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff Stephen Genthner appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superioi Court (Lincoln County, Marsano, J.) denying his claim against defendant Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (Progressive) for injuries caused by an uninsured motorist. Genthner argues on appeal that the Superior Court erred as a matter of law in applying the language of Progressive’s policy to the stipulated facts. We agree, and we vacate the judgment.

Genthner, a passenger in a vehicle insured by Progressive, was struck by a vehicle driven by a hit-and-run motorist immediately after a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Baybutt Construction Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. Peerless Insurance Co. v. BrennonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. OlivierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  5. Wolf v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PennsylvaniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GoudeauTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Nautilus Insurance Company v. Michael G. Jabar, D/B/A Mike's Roofing Co., Lisa A. Varano and Stephen M. Varano, Stern Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. Adkins v. MeadorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hall v. Acadia InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  5. Geyerhahn v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API