Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Flaumenbaum
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1970PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(I)
Matthew M. Levy, J.
The petitioner Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) instituted this special proceeding against the respondent Joseph Flaumenbaum (Flaumenbaum) seeking to stay arbitration of his claim against Allstate under an uninsured motorist endorsement of an Allstate automobile liability policy.1 The Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) was, on Flaumenbaum’s application, subsequently joined as a party respondent, as it would or might be liable to Flaumenbaum if Allstate were to succeed in this proceeding (Insurance Law, § 608).
The basic facts are not in…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Boyd v. BoydNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Hynes v. . McDermottNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Jenkins v. BurgosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Tyler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Rice v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Sybron Transition Corporation v. Security Insurance Company Of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.