Livesley v. Strauss
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.
The court instructed the jury that if they found that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover the amount paid for freight they should deduct $4,924.90; or if they found that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover any amount on account of the freight they should return a verdict for the defendant for $4,924.90. In other words, the court told the jury that Strauss was entitled at all events to the return of the advances made on the contract after deducting the price of the 29,642 pounds of hops delivered. This instruction was error.
The pleadings admit that on September 17, 1915, the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Malloy v. Marshall-Wells Hardware Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Stanford v. McGillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Catlin v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Longfellow v. HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Schucking v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BusbyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Bell v. Hanover Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Crosland v. SloanOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Rosenau v. LansingOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Imperial Laundry Co. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.