Stanford v. McGill
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Cass County; McConnell, J. Action by Lyman C. Stanford against Samuel G. McGill and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCorliss, C. J.
On the 3d of August, 1895, plaintiff and defend-defendants of 5,000 bushels of No. 1 flax, at $1 a bushel, to be delivered at Kelso, in Traill County, in this state, during the month of September of that year. On the 7th of September following, the defendants notified the plaintiff by letter that they did not recognize the binding force of the agreement, and therefore refused to carry it out on their part. This letter was received by him September 8th. At that time the plaintiff had not exercised his option to make delivery at any time during that month, as was his right under the contract.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Pierson v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Phenix Ins. v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Cook & Laurie Contracting Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- United States v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Kuhlman v. WiebenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Large Oil Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.