Legal Opinion

Imperial Laundry Co. v. Allen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff, a corporation, for some years immediately prior to September 27, 1928, engaged in the operation of a laundry in Portland, Oregon. It claims to have built up a large and profitable business. On that date, a fire occurred, destroying a large portion of the building, damaging some of the machinery and some of the customers’ goods which were in the plant to be laundered. Mr. Isaac Davis was its president and manager and owned and controlled all the stock of plaintiff.

In its complaint, it alleges that immediately after the fire many laundries in Portland tendered their services to take…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Hillman v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Schucking v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Triphonoff v. SweeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Livesley v. StraussOregon Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Le May-Lieb Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. AMCA Lumber Co. v. Buckeye-Pacific Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Emmanuel v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API