Legal Opinion

Bell v. Hanover Fire Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Manifestly, it was error for the court to award judgment bearing interest from the *518date of the issuance of the policies. From the plaintiff’s case, the loss did not occur until March 27,1920. Proof of loss was made at a later date. A valid provision of each policy reads:

“This company shall have sixty days after receipt of such sworn itemized statement of claim in which to verify, investigate such claim, and (or) make payment * * .”

The defendant Hanover Fire Insurance Company was liable to the plaintiff, if at all, for interest upon the amount due under the terms of the policies from the time…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Weber v. Pend D'Oreille Mining & Reduction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Livesley v. StraussOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Couch v. Scandinavian-American BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Fischer v. BayerOregon Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bell v. SpainOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Adams v. Northwest Farm Bureau InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Davis v. WOOD ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hamlet v. American Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Security Savings & Trust Co. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API