Legal Opinion

Rosenau v. Lansing

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for damages arising from the alleged failure of C.F. Lansing, defendant, to deliver 1,200 Italian prune trees to Ben Rosenau, plaintiff herein, in accordance with his written contract for the sale and delivery thereof. Trial was had, and at the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence the defendant moved the court for a nonsuit, which motion was granted upon the ground that plaintiff failed to show that he was at the place of delivery on the day of the alleged breach. From the judgment of the court based thereon, the plaintiff appeals.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. REHEARING DENIED.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. B. F. Bonewell & Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Krebs Hop Co. v. LivesleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Kelly v. LumWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Cullum v. WagstaffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  5. Livesley v. StraussOregon Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barmeier v. Oregon Physicians' ServiceOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Branker v. BowmanArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. United States Nat. Bank of Portland v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
  4. Rosenau v. LansingOregon Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API