Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Electrolert, Inc. v. Lindeman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1994No. 94CA59PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

On November 15,1994, relator, Electrolert, Inc., filed a verified complaint for a writ of prohibition and/or a writ of mandamus seeking to (1) require respondent, the Honorable Robert J. Lindeman, to vacate all orders, entries and other process issued by the court in case No. 94-110 in aid of execution of an interlocutory cognovit judgment, and (2) prohibit respondent from issuing any further orders in that case in aid of execution of that judgment.

Finding that respondent may have been unlawfully exercising jurisdiction, we issued on November 16, 1994, an alternative writ of prohibition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Marion Production Credit Ass'n v. CochranOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Stewart v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Jarrett v. Dayton Osteopathic Hospital, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Wall v. GrossmanOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Irvine v. Akron Beacon JournalOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. v. WALTER CONST., LTD.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. v. Walter Construction, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Farmers State Bank v. SponaugleOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State Ex Rel. Myocare Nursing Home, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API