State ex rel. Wall v. Grossman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The conditions which must exist to support the issuance of a writ of prohibition are: “(1) The court or officer against whom it is sought must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) the exercise of such power must be unauthorized by law; and (3) it must appear that the refusal of the writ would result in injury for which *5there is no other adequate remedy.” State, ex rel. Lehmann, v. Cmich (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 11.
Here, as in State, ex rel. Adler, v. Court (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 1, decided this day, there is no question of the jurisdiction of the court to hear the pending…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Lehmann v. CmichOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State ex rel. Adler v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Henry v. BrittOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Smith v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Geauga County Budget Commission v. Court of Appeals for Geauga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Electrolert, Inc. v. LindemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.